Tuesday, July 31, 2007



While looking at the Type Pad website, I was led to read Scott Adams blog. Scott is the creator of Dilbert. I was so charmed by this post, until the end, when he declares he is an agnostic rather than a believer. I still think the argument is worth considering for those of us who believe in God.




The Atheist Who Thought He Was God
Can we ever be sure about anything in life?
Is a feeling of 99% certainty enough to say you “know” something? Or do you need to feel 99.9999999999% certain before you’re willing to commit?
If you say you need to be 100% certain, you don’t understand how human brains work. It’s common for the human brain to be certain about things that later turn out to be completely false. It happens all the time, to everyone. If it has ever happened to you, then you know you can’t trust your own powers of certainty.
This brings me to atheists. In order to be certain that God doesn’t exist, you have to possess a godlike mental capacity – the ability to be 100% certain. A human can’t be 100% certain about anything. Our brains aren’t that reliable. Therefore, to be a true atheist, you have to believe you are the very thing that you argue doesn’t exist: God.
Perhaps you will argue that being 99.999999% certain God doesn’t exist is just as good as being 100% sure. That strikes me as bad math. As other philosotainers have famously noted, a small chance of spending eternity in Hell has to be taken seriously. Eternity is a long time.
Let me put this in perspective. You might be willing to accept a 10% risk of going skiing and getting hurt, but you wouldn’t accept a 10% risk of a nuclear war. The larger the potential problem, the less risk you are willing to tolerate.
An eternity in Hell is the largest penalty there could ever be. So while you might not worry about a .00000000001% chance of ending up in Hell, you can’t deny the math. .00000000001% of eternity is a lot longer than your entire mortal life. Infinitely longer.
I sometimes call myself an atheist because it’s too hard to explain Spinoza’s version of god. And it’s too hard to explain that agnosticism is the only intellectually defensible position.


After reading this I hope you will feel more grateful for the gift of the Holy Ghost, which testifies and communicates truth in a way no mortal man can, regardless of their brilliant humanity.

Enough for now...love to all.

1 comment:

Boyd Smith said...

Love your thoughts on the subject. One thing that no one seems to bring up, is that, the old adage "you see what you want to see" is very applicable.

The Holly Ghost, testifies, after the trials of our faith. We only go through the trials, after we prove our desire to know, and a willingness to do the right thing, once we come to that knowledge.

It is one of the loving things that our Heavenly Father does for us. If the knowledge that God exists, came to everyone, then those who wanted to live there life, contrary to the way God would have us live, would feel like slaves to a superior power.

Love ya lot's and I will try not to be so long winded on your blog - Boyd